A letter to Laura.
Dear Laura,
Since you appreciate the value of ‘Rocket Science,’ used in your e-mail address…<LOL> and you are so level headed and focused on achieving results….I am hoping the rest of this message may also trigger some thoughts as to how to gain traction over a problem we seem to be faced with every time we turn around.
For what it is worth, until we confront the real issue here—the tactics used by our enemies to engage us in endless debate regarding matters which should not even be discussed—we will continuously be faced with repeated attempts to violate the people’s inherent constitutionally protected rights, endowed upon we the people by our creator.
May I suggest we examine the real issue and take direct aim on the correct target. Since no one has the right to impose anything on the people without their consent, any time any official proposes any action which would be repugnant to the Constitution, we need to mount a strong, aggressive campaign focused on this act of treason against the American people.
I would submit that such an aggressive posture on any such matters would cause any elected official to give serious consideration to even dare to raise such an issue in the future.
One simply must look upon the astounding success rate of politically motivated victories achieved by threats made by a very small minority of Muslim extremists to impose their will over a much larger and obviously superior in number, but incredibly passive, majority.
Intimidation and coercion works.
Obama presents these tactics as a new art form in controlling the masses.
In light of all of these demonstrated successes it would seem to make perfect sense for we the people to adopt these tactics as well…
Is this something with which you can agree?
Do you honestly believe we would be facing this constant barrage of threats to our liberty, listed below (but certainly not limited to…), if Congress was afraid of the retaliation of the people?
- Gun Control
- Budget ceiling crisis
- Financial cliff crisis
- Middle East crisis
- Control over energy
- Censorship of media
- Using office of president for propagandizing
- Creating infomercials and presenting them as false flag events to propagandize a political agenda
- IRS crisis
- DOJ ease dropping on media
- DOJ ease dropping on Americans at will
- Police abuse
- Judicial corruption
- Gun Running in Mexico
- Gun running in Benghazi
- Murder in Benghazi
- Election fraud placing Obama in as a dictator
- Obamacare
- Smart meters
- GMO’s
- Chenmtrails
- Sharia law
- Taxation without representation
- Control over our water
- Control over our food
- Control of our private property
- Control over where people will live
- Control over our finances
- Imposition of a judicial system of commerce by which to control a person’s every action
- Imposition of control over the people by the police they pay to protect them
- Elected officials who are influenced and controlled by foreign interests instead of the people by whom they were elected.
How is it we continue to repeatedly fall for the same scams? Why is it when we get burned we don’t recognize the source of the fire? Why do we continue to engage in these charades where they (our enemies) create the situations and we take the bait?
The key to getting results (Yes…it involves the will of the people):
Not to sound like a broken record but when folks join together to create the illusion of strength and determination, then members of the de facto Congress will react to the will of the people and not a second sooner. The Congress must be impressed by the ability of the people to speak…but with ‘one’ voice.
“When enough people seize upon the same issue and express their outrage in unison, Congress will act in favor of the will of the people.”
Ever considered why this works this way? Not sure you will see it the same way, but in my view, the lobbyist have a superior position to the common folks like you and me. They are superior in several ways. They have access (direct e-mail and phone), they can offer much larger amounts of money and they have little other constraints placed upon them like you and me.
On the other hand, we, as the people,
- Must use a limited web form through which to express our concerns.
- Phone calls are screened by staff
- You and I are severely limited to the amount of money we can contribute to a reelection campaign and
- we are only important to members of Congress when they seek election…every two or four years.
So to my way of thinking, we must demonstrate our strength by exercising such extreme power that we offset the disadvantages deliberately placed upon us by the system (our enemies).
Let’s face it the deck is stacked in their favor from the git-go. As an example, did your elected officials consult with you before instituting the web form e-mail system? How bout when they issue themselves a pay increase? How about when they excluded themselves from Obamacare? How about when they created their pension plan? Salary for life? I think you get the picture.
Therefore we must explore other opportunities to resolve this uneven playing field. One way is to use the power of de facto to deal with issues within the de facto. Such solutions may provide interim resolution to some of these issues until we can create a very powerful alternative.
Meanwhile, here are a few options you may wish to consider as just an example. In the end, it is up to the people to make their choices known and then to elect to act in unison and express the will of the people:
Call for Feinstein to be removed from office, by expulsion
The People to Investigate and INDICT POLITICIANS FOR CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR
